Re: Indirect indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Indirect indexes
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jLRR9MTU9vJL2VEjKSu=1YaBJKrErTW1C61ewX3qV07iw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indirect indexes  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 18 October 2016 at 21:41, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> Are we
> trading initial performance gains for performance degradation through
> maintenance?

Eh? That's backwards, so No. The whole point of this is it avoids long
term degradation currently caused by non-HOT updates.

Normal UPDATEs that don't change PKs won't generate any changes to
VACUUM away, so only actions that remove PK values will cause anything
to be collected and removed from indexes.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: "Some tests to cover hash_index"
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Indirect indexes