Re: [HACKERS] Online enabling of page level checksums - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Online enabling of page level checksums
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jLQn4w48K+c2dLYMkiRNzzrZ6fN9Q3BxsbikrB4KRXsOQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Online enabling of page level checksums  (David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Online enabling of page level checksums  (David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 23 January 2017 at 16:32, David Christensen <david@endpoint.com> wrote:

> ** Handling checksums on a standby:
>
> How to handle checksums on a standby is a bit trickier since checksums are inherently a local cluster state and not
WALlogged but we are storing state in the system tables for each database we need to make sure that the replicas
reflecttruthful state for the checksums for the cluster. 

Not WAL logged? If the objective of this feature is robustness, it
will need to be WAL logged.

Relation options aren't accessed by the startup process during
recovery, so that part won't work in recovery. Perhaps disable
checksumming until the everything is enabled rather than relation by
relation.

If y'all serious about this then you're pretty late in the cycle for
such a huge/critical patch. So lets think of ways of reducing the
complexity...

Seems most sensible to add the "enable checksums for table" function
into VACUUM because then it will happen automatically via autovacuum,
or you could force the issue using something like
vacuumdb --jobs 4 --enable-checksums
That gives you vacuum_delay and a background worker for no effort

Hope that helps

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical Replication WIP