Re: FSM versus GIN pending list bloat - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: FSM versus GIN pending list bloat
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jK+=HxxrDL7ZPyzkgHfE1onmQ=z5sVML0qWmA4pLqhjrQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to FSM versus GIN pending list bloat  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: FSM versus GIN pending list bloat  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Re: FSM versus GIN pending list bloat  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4 August 2015 at 06:03, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
 
The attached proof of concept patch greatly improves the bloat for both the insert and the update cases.  You need to turn on both features: adding the pages to fsm, and vacuuming the fsm, to get the benefit (so JJ_GIN=3).  The first of those two things could probably be adopted for real, but the second probably is not acceptable.  What is the right way to do this?  Could a variant of RecordFreeIndexPage bubble the free space up the map immediately rather than waiting for a vacuum?  It would only have to move up until it found a page with freespace already recorded in it, which the vast majority of the time would mean observing up one level and then not writing to it, assuming the pending list pages remain well clustered.

You make a good case for action here since insert only tables with GIN indexes on text are a common use case for GIN. 

Why would vacuuming the FSM be unacceptable? With a large gin_pending_list_limit it makes sense.

If it is unacceptable, perhaps we can avoid calling it every time, or simply have FreeSpaceMapVacuum() terminate more quickly on some kind of 80/20 heuristic for this case.

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE using EXCLUDED.column gives an error about mismatched types
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Using quicksort and a merge step to significantly improve on tuplesort's single run "external sort"