Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. ); - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Date
Msg-id CANP8+j+wwvGvXgRHmuwEUymhAGXY1+ZC8SMu+u6kvK9OwsPsQg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
On 31 July 2015 at 02:46, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
 
> Added. I really don't know if my isolation tests are completely correct, is
> my first time writing this kind of tests.

This patch size has increased from 16k to 157k because of the output
of the isolation tests you just added. 

That's too much.

Why do we need more isolation tests? There isn't anything critical here, its just different lock levels for ALTER TABLE. A few normal regression tests are fine for this. 

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: creating extension including dependencies