On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 18:40, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-24 20:21, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 2020-06-24 10:12, Vik Fearing wrote:
> >> On 6/24/20 8:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>> I was checking some loose ends in SQL conformance, when I noticed: We
> >>> support GRANT role ... GRANTED BY CURRENT_USER, but we don't support
> >>> CURRENT_ROLE in that place, even though in PostgreSQL they are
> >>> equivalent. Here is a trivial patch to add that.
> >>
> >>
> >> The only thing that isn't dead-obvious about this patch is the commit
> >> message says "[PATCH 1/2]". What is in the other part?
> >
> > Hehe. The second patch is some in-progress work to add the GRANTED BY
> > clause to the regular GRANT command. More on that perhaps at a later date.
>
> Here is the highly anticipated and quite underwhelming second part of
> this patch set.
Looks great, but no test to confirm it works. I would suggest adding a
test and committing directly since I don't see any cause for further
discussion.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
