Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Date
Msg-id CANP8+j+kB94LDkHr_b7B07C-tOadsPoHY3T62BejDEwPHXj9mQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 13 April 2017 at 18:47, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:

> But on second thought, I don't think that reporting NULL as the priority when
> quorum-based sync replication is used is less confusing. When there is async
> standby, we report 0 as its priority when synchronous_standby_names is empty
> or a priority-based sync replication is configured. But with the patch, when
> a quorum-based one is specified, NULL is reported for that.
> Isn't this confusing?

To me, yes, it is confusing.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Minor typo in partition.c
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Minor typo in partition.c