Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon
Date
Msg-id CANP8+j+UJsDTDp+r5RBvtH6BzU1wLZ4HJPhgFxySeEocATh_Ag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon
List pgsql-hackers
On 5 June 2018 at 17:14, MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com> wrote:

> Furthermore, an extra hop and double parsing/planning could matter for
> analytic queries, too.  For example, SAP HANA boasts of scanning 1
> billion rows in one second.  In HANA's scaleout architecture, an
> application can connect to any worker node and the node communicates
> with other nodes only when necessary (there's one special node called
> "master", but it manages the catalog and transactions; it's not an
> extra hop like the coordinator in XL).  Vertica is an MPP analytics
> database, but it doesn't have a node like the coordinator, either.  To
> achieve maximum performance for real-time queries, the scaleout
> architecture should avoid an extra hop when possible.

Agreed. When possible.

When is it possible?

Two ways I know of are:

1. have pre-knowledge in the client of where data is located
(difficult to scale)
2. you must put data in all places the client can connect to (i.e. multimaster)

Perhaps there are more?

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon