But why should 1 SELECT or 20 SELECTs or 200 SELECTs have to do a job, while the user waits, which is fundamentally VACUUM's duty to do in the background?
Agreed. I don't see a % as giving us anything at all.
The idea is that we want to turn an O(N) problem for one query into an O(1) task.
The use case I see for this is when there is a mixed workload. There is one select which reads the entire table, and hundreds of thousands of selects/updates/insert that don't, and of course vacuum comes along every now and then and does it thing. Why should the one massive SELECT have horrible performance just because it was run right before autovacuum would have kicked in instead of right after if finished?
+1
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
