On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:49 PM Fujii Masao
<masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2025/02/06 8:57, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 9:31 PM Ryo Kanbayashi <kanbayashi.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi hackers,
> >>
> >> When I wrote patch of ecpg command notice bug, I recognized needs of
> >> regression tests for ecpg command notices and I say that I write the
> >> tests.
>
> Thanks for working on this!
>
>
> >> I explain about implementation of this patch.
> >>
> >> What is this patch
> >> - add regression tests which test ecpg command notices such as warning
> >> and errors
> >> - test notices implemented in ecpg.addons file
> >>
> >> Basic policy on implementation
> >> - do in a way that matches the method using the existing pg_regress
> >> command as much as possible
> >> - avoid methods that increase the scope of influence
> >>
> >> Next, I list answers to points that are likely to be pointed out in
> >> advance below :)
> >> - shell scripts and bat files is used due to ...
> >> avoid non zero exit code of ecpg command makes tests failure
> >> avoid increasing C code for executing binary which cares cross platform
> >> - python code is used because I couldn't write meson.build
> >> appropriately describe dependency about materials which is used on
> >> tests without it. please help me...
> >> - as you said, kick this kind of tests by pg_regress accompanied with
> >> needless PG server process execution. but pg_regress doesn't execute
> >> test without it and making pg_regress require modification which has
> >> not small scope of influence
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler to use the existing TAP test mechanism,
> as shown in the attached patch? Please note that this patch is very WIP,
> so there would be many places that need further implementation and refinement.
Fujii San,
Thank you for reviewing and indication of better implementation.
I rewrite my patch based on your reference implementation :)
---
Great regards,
Ryo Kanbayashi
NTT Open Source Software Center
