On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 9:42 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:49AM +0900, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote:
> > If you can't work for ther patch for a while because you are busy or
> > other some reason,
> > I can become additinal reviewer and apply review comments from Micael
> > to the patch instead of you.
> >
> > If you don't want my action, please reply and notice me that. If
> > possible, within a week :)
>
> Putting a bit of context here. Most of the Postgres hackers based in
> Japan had a meeting last Friday, and Kanbayashi-san has asked me about
> patches that introduce to simpler code paths in the tree that could be
> worked on for this release. I've mentioned this thread to him.
>
> > Just to let you know, my action is not intended to steal your
> > contribution but to prevent your good idea from being lost.
>
> Authors and reviewers get busy because of life and work matters, and
> contributions are listed in the commit logs for everybody who
> participates. If you can help move this patch forward, thanks a lot
> for the help! IMO, that would be great. The patch set still needs
> more reorganization and adjustments, but I think that we can get it
> there.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 3:07 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 08:53 +0900, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote:
> > Just to let you know, my action is not intended to steal your
> > contribution but to prevent your good idea from being lost.
> >
> > TO: Mecael and other hackers,
> >
> > There are any problem in light of community customs?
>
> Anything submitted to the mailing list is no longer private
> intellectual property. You are free and welcome to start working
> on any patch that you are interested in and that seems neglected
> by the author. There is no problem with listing more than one
> author.
Michael and Laurenz,
Thank you for context description and comments to my action :)
I start coding to complete the patch :)
---
Great regards,
Ryo Kanbayashi
