On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:29 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:32:10PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:47:24AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 9:35 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Oh, yeah, I think that works, actually. I was imagining a few problems > > > here, but I don't think they really exist. The redo routines for files > > > within the directory can't possibly care about having the old files > > > erased for them, since that wouldn't be something that would normally > > > happen, if there were no recent CREATE TABLESPACE involved. And > > > there's code further down to remove and recreate the symlink, just in > > > case. So I think your proposed patch might be all we need. > > > > Noah, do you plan to commit this? > > Yes. I feel it needs a test case, which is the main reason I've queued the > task rather than just pushed what I posted last.
Here's what I plan to push. Besides adding a test,
I have reproduced the issue of data inconsistency with CREATE TABLESPACE at wal_level=minimal,
also I have tested the fix with v0 and v1 patch, and come up with a similar tap-testcase(as in v1). The test case looks good.
