On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 16:57, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 09:28, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > > > And perhaps just putting that everything that calls > > pgstat_count_io_op_time() under track_io_timing is just natural? > > What's the performance regression you would expect if both WAL and > > block I/O are controlled by that, still one would expect only one of > > them? > > I will check these and I hope I will come back with something meaningful.
I applied the patches on upstream postgres and then run pgbench for each available clock sources couple of times: