Hi,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 14:00, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 at 20:12, Jacob Champion
> <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 2:59 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Andres off-list mentioned that if we explicitly enable features for
> > > *all* of the tasks, then none of the tasks will be testing the auto
> > > feature option and I agree with Andres. My suggestion is setting
> > > features to auto for Debian - Meson task. I decided on this because I
> > > think it is the most checked CI task
> >
> > Hehe, that's certainly true for me...
> >
> > > so it would be easier to catch if
> > > one of the features is disabled without anyone noticing.
> >
> > Seems reasonable. If we do this, can we rename the job with a "- Meson
> > Auto" suffix or something, to try to call the difference out
> > explicitly?
>
> I think renaming it would be better but then we have two Linux tasks:
>
> - Linux - Debian Bookworm - Autoconf
> - Linux - Debian Bookworm - Meson Auto
>
> For me it looks like 'Meson Auto' can be confused with 'Autoconf'. We
> can rename it as a 'Meson Auto Feature Detection' but that is a bit
> longer. Do you have any ideas? If you think 'Meson Auto' is good
> enough, we can continue with it, too.
I renamed 'Meson Auto' as 'Meson Auto Feature Detection' in v5.
--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft
