Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Selena Deckelmann
Subject Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Date
Msg-id CAN1EF+y9rwzGpJqjzjB56th8uKH5DVJQd0wkB1Fkfnb_yDw-DA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy



On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
* Selena Deckelmann (selena@chesnok.com) wrote:
> None are empowered to sign contracts or legally represent the developers
> who make up PGDG.

It is not the developers comprised of PGDG who are required to sign into
an NDA.  It is company A, B, or C who would need to sign an NDA with "some
legal entity", giving that legal entity the power/right to sue company A,
B, or C, were they to release the information provided to them
inappropriately under a breach of contract.

Notionally, perhaps a PGDG developer would provide the data to the
'legal entity' who would then provide the information to the company, to
legitimatize the contract, but that would not require any NDA or
contract to be signed by the PGDG developer.

Hmmm. Interesting.

Yeah, not a fan :)

-selena


--
http://chesnok.com

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions