On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:08 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi,
On 2018-10-09 16:04:35 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > More generally, I'd like this material to be code comments. It's the > kind of stuff that gets outdated before long if it's kept separate.
I'm not sure I buy this here - we don't have (but perhaps should?) a convenient location for an overview comment around this. There's no "signal_handling.c" where it'd clearly belong - given the lack of a clear point to look to, I don't think a README.SIGNAL_HANDLING would get out-of-date more quickly than code comments in mildly related place (say postgres.c or miscinit.c) would get out of date at a different pace.
The other point is that "This is the way to do it" is a little easier when in a README rather than in code comments sine those might be scattered in a bunch of different places.
