Re: remaining sql/json patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nikita Malakhov
Subject Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date
Msg-id CAN-LCVO1sbBE4VdzSRqkSOdKNaD-KztZFR1oWvJmiqOuM3HNpg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remaining sql/json patches  (Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi!

Read Tom Lane's note in previous discussion (quite long, so I've missed it)
on pg_proc column -

>I strongly recommend against having a new pg_proc column at all.
>I doubt that you really need it, and having one will create
>enormous mechanical burdens to making the conversion.  (For example,
>needing a catversion bump every time we convert one more function,
>or an extension version bump to convert extensions.)

so should figure out another way to do it.

Regards,
--
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add XMLText function (SQL/XML X038)