On 2 September 2016 at 17:05, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> Re: Craig Ringer 2016-09-02 <CAMsr+YFr6Sk=bbU2yCORN7z9foHF0cqx29vk5B49DswQ6EkVxg@mail.gmail.com>
>> I thought about that but figured it didn't really matter too much,
>> when thinking about examples like
>>
>> # COPY batch_demo FROM '/root/secret.csv' WITH (FORMAT CSV);
>> ERROR: could not open file "/root/secret.csv" for reading: Permission denied
>>
>> or whatever, where the user doesn't understand why they can't read the
>> file given that their local client has permission to do so.
>>
>> I don't feel strongly about this and think that the error on ENOENT is
>> by far the most important, so I'll adjust it per your recommendation.
>
> Couldn't you just add EACCESS to the check as well?
Yeah, probably. Those are really the only two failures I think it's
worth reporting for.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
