Hi, On 2018-07-01 14:46:47 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > There has been some discussion around excluding large items from the > current commitfest, for several reasons. However I don't recall ever > seeing a definition of a large item. It seems to be a bit like "I know > it when I see it." I've been looking at the current commitfest > entries. Based on that I suggest a heuristic that says a commitfest > item with patches greater than 5000 lines is large.
FWIW, I personally think the criteria should rather be "old" or "very small". I.e. for patches that have waited for review being large shouldn't necessarily be an impediment for getting worked on (depending on invasiveness maybe not committed), and very small for newer things should be way below 5kloc.
I agree. I think the idea is to stop people (um, totally not guilty of this) from dropping big or intrusive patches in late CFs.
A 10 line patch can be massively intrusive and contentious. A 5000 line patch can be a mechanical change that nobody disagrees with, or a mature patch that just needed a few tweaks and missed commit in the last CF.
If a line limit is used, we'll get people optimising for the line limit. I don't think that's a win.
