Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YGXwBi96waPxp2fb2p4Lz3tkrA4QYsW9A0RDW+Tg3tgdQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view


On 11 Dec. 2016 07:44, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

I think we need to do at least this much for v10, because otherwise
we'll face ABI issues if an extension is compiled against code with
one semaphore API choice and used with code with a different one.

+1, this is a good idea. Your performance comments make sense too.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] Short reads in hash indexes
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes