Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YGJocR5+aik9a8yAac=YSFMJJAPRCCDXjTCfxYFM3W0-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 27 February 2016 at 15:29, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
 
Two reasons:
1. There is no ideal implementation of DTM which will fit all possible needs and be  efficient for all clusters.
2. Even if such implementation exists, still the right way of it integration is Postgres should use kind of TM API.


I've got to say that this is somewhat reminicient of the discussions around in-core pooling, where argument 1 is applied to justify excluding pooling from core/contrib.

I don't have a strong position on whether a DTM should be in core or not as I haven't done enough work in the area. I do think it's interesting to strongly require that a DTM be in core while we also reject things like pooling that are needed by a large proportion of users.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: ExecGather() + nworkers
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequence Access Method WIP