Re: WIP: Failover Slots - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: WIP: Failover Slots
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YFt4iDZQ8pkKQ+Rd37howXE57rF3O1m+a9S=WZrXvF3qg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Failover Slots  (Oleksii Kliukin <alexk@hintbits.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5 April 2016 at 04:19, Oleksii Kliukin <alexk@hintbits.com> wrote:
 
Thank you for the update. I’ve got some rejects when applying the 0001-Allow-replication-slots-to-follow-failover.patch after the "Dirty replication slots when confirm_lsn is changed” changes. I think it should be rebased against the master, (might be the consequence of the "logical slots follow the timeline” patch committed).

I'll rebase it on top of the new master after timeline following for logical slots got committed and follow up shortly.

That said, I've marked this patch 'returned with feedback' in the CF. It should possibly actually be 'rejected' given the discussion on the logical decoding timeline following thread, which points heavily at a different approach to solving this problem in 9.7.

That doesn't mean nobody can pick it up if they think it's valuable and want to run with it, but we're very close to feature freeze now.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Timeline following for logical slots
Next
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'