Re: Looks like we can enable AF_UNIX on Windows now - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: Looks like we can enable AF_UNIX on Windows now
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YFSTGAVis5vTxFEHJsxj7fuBp9HfLUCMrgS_hOC3tHrWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Looks like we can enable AF_UNIX on Windows now  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Looks like we can enable AF_UNIX on Windows now  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 30 May 2018 at 09:53, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:


On May 29, 2018 9:44:09 PM EDT, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/commandline/2017/12/19/af_unix-comes-to-windows/
>
>The latest Windows 10 update shipped with AF_UNIX socket support for
>win32
>sockets.
>
>It's not that exciting because it doesn't support socketpair() or fd
>passing - yet. So really it doesn't offer us much more than we can
>already
>get with win32 named pipes. We can - and do - already get fd passing
>with
>DuplicateHandle anyway.
>
>Still, I thought it was interesting. We could probably just
>conditionally
>enable AF_UNIX sockets on new enough windows SDKs. Apparently if it's
>not
>supported by the OS runtime you get a graceful error.

Last time I checked it didn't support transporting user identification though. Which means not that much value would be added. Is that still the case?

Right, so it is. I missed that.

They implemented unix sockets, except the interesting bits.
 
--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Supporting tls-server-end-point as SCRAM channel binding forOpenSSL 1.0.0 and 1.0.1