Re: C based plugins, clocks, locks, and configuration variables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: C based plugins, clocks, locks, and configuration variables
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YEmMk4V39OqEfkGg9U6iqQxDrwFiv7AH-Ed2+kvj9oBVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C based plugins, clocks, locks, and configuration variables  (Clifford Hammerschmidt <tanglebones@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: C based plugins, clocks, locks, and configuration variables  (Clifford Hammerschmidt <tanglebones@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">On 9 Nov. 2016 02:48, "Clifford Hammerschmidt" <<a
href="mailto:tanglebones@gmail.com">tanglebones@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > Looking closer at the bit
math,I screwed it up.... it should be 64 bits time, 6 bit uuid version, 8 node, 8 seq, and the rest random ... which is
42bits of random. I'll find the code in a bit.<p dir="ltr">Huh, so that's what you are doing. <p dir="ltr">I just added
thesame thing to the 9.6 BDR development tree last week, though using 64-bit values, based on a draft Petr wrote. Feel
freeto take a look. bdr-plugin/dev-bdr96 branch in 2ndQuadrant/bdr github repo. The main file is seq2.c .<br /> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2