On 16 November 2015 at 09:50, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
I haven't seen this discussed before, but I don't find the name pg_report_log particularly good. Why not jut pg_log?
Sounds like a better name to me. 'report' is noise that adds nothing useful.
I'd like to have this functionality.
I'd prefer to omit fields if explicitly assigned to NULL. You can always use coalesce if you want the string 'NULL'; I agree with others here that the vast majority of users will want the field just omitted.
