Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: > I've taken your patch, and changed the wording a bit. I think that > it's worth being a bit more explicit. The attached revision produces > output that looks like this:
> Patches should use a more-or-less consecutive range of OIDs. > Best practice is to make a random choice in the range 8000-9999. > Suggested random unused OID: 9099
Noob question here: why not start with the next unused OID in the range, and on the other hand reserve the range for sequentially-assigned values?
