Re: [PERFORM] performance problem on big tables - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: [PERFORM] performance problem on big tables
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1zsJd4eKhDa0MLzDxUzPnJ=0YaPK01YMx3-izm=gwiJfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PERFORM] performance problem on big tables  (Mariel Cherkassky <mariel.cherkassky@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Mariel Cherkassky <mariel.cherkassky@gmail.com> wrote:

I have performance issues with two big tables. Those tables are located on an oracle remote database. I'm running the quert : insert into local_postgresql_table select * from oracle_remote_table.

The first table has 45M records and its size is 23G. The import of the data from the oracle remote database is taking 1 hour and 38 minutes.

To investigate this, I'd decouple the two steps and see how long each one takes:

\copy (select * from oracle_remote_table) to /tmp/tmp with binary
\copy local_postresql_table from /tmp/tmp with binary

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Rick Otten
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] performance problem on big tables
Next
From: Jeremy Finzel
Date:
Subject: [PERFORM] Odd sudden performance degradation related to temp object churn