Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1zo8bPjkvrSF=PWG4GEkQBYhNPD32Dd9a0DuqF-+4XwNg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files  ("Phil Endecott" <spam_from_pgsql_lists@chezphil.org>)
Responses Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Phil Endecott <spam_from_pgsql_lists@chezphil.org> wrote:
Hi Jeff,

Jeff Janes wrote:
The possibilities are endless, and an example cannot cover all of them while still usefully serving as an example. There are canned systems for handling this more thoroughly, and you should look into using one of them.

Do you believe that the docs should point this out?

Currently there are about 18,000 words of what appears to be very
thorough documentation about implementing replication, yet they
do not refer the reader to tools like pgBackRest.  When I post
about the issues that I have had, the overwhelming view of the
mailing lists is that pgBackRest is essential - yet this important
advice is not conveyed to new users of this feature who are relying
on the official documentation.


I think it might be a good idea to propose use of a canned solution, but I don't know how the community would feel about mentioning specific projects by name.  And if we didn't mention any by name, I think it would be pretty awkward to advise to give.

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15340: FATAL ERROR: The application server could not becontacted.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15335: Documentation is wrong about archive_command andexisting files