Re: recovery testing for beta - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: recovery testing for beta
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1zO=15Rx2xkmgaCsSvmD2vwYOwqENi6s9xQmKpScpHFCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: recovery testing for beta  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
On 05/29/2014 07:39 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
It also implicitly tested the xlog parallel write slots thing, as that is
common code to all recovery.

During development, I hit a lot of bugs in that patch by setting wal_buffers to 32kb (the minimum). Causes more backends to wait for each other, exposing deadlocks.

I've run the foreign key version with 32kb for a while and nothing turned up.  I should probably run the gist or gin versions, as they should put more stress on the volume of  WAL generated.

Thanks

Jeff

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: slotname vs slot_name
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: slotname vs slot_name