On 05/06/14 19:56, Andres Freund wrote:
> On June 5, 2014 7:43:06 PM CEST, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> For my part, I'd strongly prefer a name based on the term "logical
>>>> decoding".
>>
>>> There is no reason not to use long names, so I think
>> pg_logical_decoding
>>> is fine.
>>
>> +1
>
> Still not a fan oft having decoding in the name. I've at least one patch pending (replication identifiers, submitted
acouple months back) that will need to stash a couple of files somewhere. And it's for the apply side, not the decoding
side.
>
Personally I like your suggestion of pg_logical
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
