On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> At 2013-07-10 09:47:34 -0700, josh@agliodbs.com wrote:
>>
>> Due to the apparent lack of performance testing, I'm setting this back
>> to "needs review".
>
> The original submission (i.e. the message linked from the CF page)
> includes test results that showed a clear performance improvement.
I think the reviewer of a performance patch should do some independent
testing of the performance, to replicate the author's numbers; and
hopefully with a few different scenarios.
Cheers,
Jeff
