Re: PANIC in GIN code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: PANIC in GIN code
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1yoHa2tiyt_F_j6J5bqj66iY798PpBWvrGTOEaiY5doHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PANIC in GIN code  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: PANIC in GIN code  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
On 06/26/2015 08:02 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
Under high load against f7bb7f0625771bc71869cda, I occasionally get:

PANIC:  XLogBeginInsert was not called

It seems to only come from vacuuming.

Here is an example back-trace:

#0  0x0000003dcb632625 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x0000003dcb633e05 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x000000000079a39c in errfinish (dummy=<value optimized out>) at
elog.c:551
#3  0x000000000079b0e4 in elog_finish (elevel=<value optimized out>,
fmt=<value optimized out>) at elog.c:1368
#4  0x00000000004dd1fe in XLogInsert (rmid=13 '\r', info=48 '0') at
xloginsert.c:412
#5  0x0000000000478e13 in ginPlaceToPage (btree=0x7fff1fbb7f60,
stack=0x2878760, insertdata=<value optimized out>, updateblkno=<value
optimized out>,
     childbuf=0, buildStats=<value optimized out>) at ginbtree.c:582
#6  0x0000000000479a33 in ginInsertValue (btree=0x7fff1fbb7f60,
stack=0x2878760, insertdata=0x7fff1fbb7fe0, buildStats=0x0) at
ginbtree.c:751
#7  0x000000000047364a in ginEntryInsert (ginstate=0x7fff1fbb8280,
attnum=54624, key=1, category=<value optimized out>, items=0x287d3c0,
nitem=1,
     buildStats=0x0) at gininsert.c:234
#8  0x000000000047ef4b in ginInsertCleanup (ginstate=0x7fff1fbb8280,
vac_delay=<value optimized out>, stats=0x2868d90) at ginfast.c:843
#9  0x000000000047e024 in ginbulkdelete (fcinfo=<value optimized out>) at
ginvacuum.c:547


 From the code, it seems obvious that XLogBeginInsert is getting called at
ginbtree.c line 373, so I think that some obscure code path of
btree->placeToPage must be either consuming or resetting that
XLogBeginInsert before it returns control to ginbtree.c

Here's a theory:

First of all, you have checksums or wal_log_hints enabled.

Correct, checksums are on.  I forgot all about that.
 

The page is being split (that's evident from "info=48" above). ginPlaceToPage calls GinNewBuffer, which calls GetFreeIndexPage(). That finds a page that can be recycled, and marks it as used. RecordUsedIndexPage calls MarkBufferDirtyHint(), which in turn calls XLogSaveBufferForHint() to create a full-page image record of the page. That calls XLogBeginInsert() + XLogInsert(), and leaves the begininsert_called == false.

If you had assertions enabled, you'd see the assertion in XLogBeginInsert() to fail.

I'll look into that over the weekend..


Should the assertion in XLogBeginInsert() be a elog(FATAL,...) instead?  The performance impact should be negligible (touches process-local memory which is already being touched a few instructions later) and it will produce better bug reports, and backtraces, should there be more issues.

I thought it would takes days to reproduce this with a enable-cassert build, but it actually reproduced much faster that way.  Your theory looks completely correct.


#0  0x0000003dcb632625 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x0000003dcb633e05 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x00000000007d18bd in ExceptionalCondition (conditionName=<value optimized out>, errorType=<value optimized out>, fileName=<value optimized out>,
    lineNumber=<value optimized out>) at assert.c:54
#3  0x00000000004f8067 in XLogBeginInsert () at xloginsert.c:125
#4  0x00000000004f83d5 in XLogSaveBufferForHint (buffer=241, buffer_std=<value optimized out>) at xloginsert.c:907
#5  0x00000000006b64af in MarkBufferDirtyHint (buffer=241, buffer_std=<value optimized out>) at bufmgr.c:3085
#6  0x00000000006be859 in fsm_set_and_search (rel=<value optimized out>, addr=..., slot=1160, newValue=0 '\000', minValue=0 '\000') at freespace.c:621
#7  0x00000000006be8f6 in RecordPageWithFreeSpace (rel=0x7f01e7fe0560, heapBlk=1160, spaceAvail=<value optimized out>) at freespace.c:188
#8  0x00000000006bf105 in GetFreeIndexPage (rel=0x7f01e7fe0560) at indexfsm.c:43
#9  0x00000000004750b2 in GinNewBuffer (index=0x7f01e7fe0560) at ginutil.c:218
#10 0x000000000047d5c4 in ginPlaceToPage (btree=0x7fffe3a55840, stack=0x1307b78, insertdata=<value optimized out>, updateblkno=<value optimized out>,
    childbuf=0, buildStats=0x0) at ginbtree.c:442
#11 0x000000000047f2dd in ginInsertValue (btree=0x7fffe3a55840, stack=0x1307b78, insertdata=0x7fffe3a558c0, buildStats=0x0) at ginbtree.c:751
#12 0x0000000000475b7b in ginEntryInsert (ginstate=0x7fffe3a55b80, attnum=58216, key=1, category=<value optimized out>, items=0x7f01e7f61120, nitem=11,
    buildStats=0x0) at gininsert.c:234
#13 0x0000000000485dfc in ginInsertCleanup (ginstate=0x7fffe3a55b80, vac_delay=<value optimized out>, stats=0x12bbbc8) at ginfast.c:843
#14 0x0000000000484d83 in ginbulkdelete (fcinfo=<value optimized out>) at ginvacuum.c:547

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing