Re: Checkpoint distribution - Mailing list pgsql-performance
| From | Jeff Janes |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Checkpoint distribution |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | CAMkU=1yL_Gr1cxKSGKr117CPOVxqo1iTcBoquMD+KfM=1Cgj5w@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Checkpoint distribution (Borodin Vladimir <root@simply.name>) |
| Responses |
Re: Checkpoint distribution
|
| List | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:46 AM, Borodin Vladimir <root@simply.name> wrote:
Hi all.I’m running PostgreSQL 9.3.4 and doing stress test of the database with writing only load. The test plan does 1000 transactions per second (each of them does several updates/inserts). The problem is that checkpoint is not distributed over time well. When the checkpoint finishes, the db gets lots of I/O operations and response timings grows strongly.My checkpoint settings looks like that:postgres=# select name, setting from pg_catalog.pg_settings where name like 'checkpoint%' and boot_val != reset_val;name | setting------------------------------+---------checkpoint_completion_target | 0.9checkpoint_segments | 100500checkpoint_timeout | 600(3 rows)postgres=#But in the log I see that checkpoint continues less than 600*0.9 = 540 seconds:2014-04-14 12:54:41.479 MSK,,,10517,,53468da6.2915,433,,2014-04-10 16:25:10 MSK,,0,LOG,00000,"checkpoint starting: time",,,,,,,,,""2014-04-14 12:57:06.107 MSK,,,10517,,53468da6.2915,434,,2014-04-10 16:25:10 MSK,,0,LOG,00000,"checkpoint complete: wrote 65140 buffers (24.8%); 0 transaction log file(s) added, 0 removed, 327 recycled; write=134.217 s, sync=10.292 s, total=144.627 s; sync files=31, longest=3.332 s, average=0.331 s",,,,,,,,,»"
When a checkpoint starts, the checkpointer process counts up all the buffers that need to be written. Then it goes through and writes them. It paces itself by comparing how many buffers it itself has written to how many need to be written. But if a buffer that needs to be checkpointed happens to get written by some other process (the background writer, or a backend, because they need a clean buffer to read different data into), the checkpointer is not notified of this and doesn't count that buffer as being written when it computes whether it is on track. This causes it to finish early. This can be confusing, but probably doesn't cause any real problems. The reason for checkpoint_completion_target is to spread the IO out over a longer time, but if much of the checkpoint IO is really being done by the background writer, than it is already getting spread out fairly well.
When the checkpoint starts (12:54:41.479) dstat says that I/O load increases:
...
But when it finishes (12:57:06.107) the I/O load is much higher than the hardware can do:
During the writing phase of the checkpoint, PostgreSQL passes the dirty data to the OS. At the end, it then tells the OS to make sure that that data has actually reached disk. If your OS stored up too much dirty data in memory then it kind of freaks out once it is notified it needs to actually write that data to disk. The best solution for this may be to lower dirty_background_bytes or dirty_background_ratio so the OS doesn't store up so much trouble for itself.
Cheers
Jeff
pgsql-performance by date: