I should have been more explicit. My main issue is with the following statement from the link that you posted:
> A key limitation of the JDBC driver is that it cannot receive asynchronous notifications and must poll the backend to check if any notifications were issued
Polling is much less efficient than event handling and I'm sure that there's a major performance hit with that.
Isn't that addressed here?:
// If this thread is the only one that uses the connection, a timeout can be used to // receive notifications immediately: // org.postgresql.PGNotification notifications[] = pgconn.getNotifications(10000);
It "helps", but it's still not the same as keeping the connection open and receiving messages in real time.
But it is the same as that. It keeps the connection open, and receives the messages in real time. It blocks either until it gets a NOTIFY, or for 10 seconds, whichever occurs first. You can use 0 to block forever until a NOTIFY arrives. Maybe you didn't remove the sleep a few lines further down? Or is there some other problem here?
