Re: Streaming replication with sync slave, but disconnects due to missing WAL segments - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: Streaming replication with sync slave, but disconnects due to missing WAL segments
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1wpFx84CTpU3kCL0cUj6VompdDU=L41cpLY5MMLuPhbow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Streaming replication with sync slave, but disconnects due to missing WAL segments  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: Streaming replication with sync slave, but disconnects due to missing WAL segments
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:25 AM, <Mads.Tandrup@schneider-electric.com> wrote:
>> I have a question about sync streaming replication.
>>
>> I have 2 postgresql 9.1 servers set up with streaming replication. On the
>> master node the slave is configured as a synchronous standby. I've verified
>> that pg_stat_replication shows sync_state = sync for the slave node.
>>
>> It all seems to work fine. But I have noticed that sometimes when I restore
>> backups created by pg_dump. The slave node will disconnect with the message
>> in the postgresql log:
>
> You cannot use pg_dump to set up a database for receiving streaming replication.
>
> For that it must be a physical copy, not a logical copy which is what pg_dump generates.

I think you misunderstood - he restores a dump on
the *primary* and that makes replication fall over
because it cannot catch up.

Ah, I see.  And the synchronization point doesn't help, because it only occurs at commit-time and if the dump is being loaded in a single transaction, then the transaction could last for several checkpoints.  By the time it tries to synchronize, it is already too late.

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: Synonyms in PostgreSQL 9.2.4
Next
From: Raymond O'Donnell
Date:
Subject: Re: How to modify dump files created by pg_dump