On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 10:09 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Those cases will go through calc_non_nestloop_required_outer which has
/* neither path can require rels from the other */ Assert(!bms_overlap(outer_paramrels, inner_path->parent->relids)); Assert(!bms_overlap(inner_paramrels, outer_path->parent->relids));
Looking at these two assertions it occurred to me that shouldn't we check against top_parent_relids for an otherrel since paths are parameterized by top-level parents? We do that in try_nestloop_path.
/* neither path can require rels from the other */ - Assert(!bms_overlap(outer_paramrels, inner_path->parent->relids)); - Assert(!bms_overlap(inner_paramrels, outer_path->parent->relids)); + Assert(!bms_overlap(outer_paramrels, + inner_path->parent->top_parent_relids ? + inner_path->parent->top_parent_relids : + inner_path->parent->relids)); + Assert(!bms_overlap(inner_paramrels, + outer_path->parent->top_parent_relids ? + outer_path->parent->top_parent_relids : + outer_path->parent->relids));
This is not related to the issue being discussed here. Maybe it should be a separate issue.
