Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Guo
Subject Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)
Date
Msg-id CAMbWs4_-LviJ=F50vmyBeh=Mkmo2Dkigq2Mhm1pZn-c7yEkbMg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 5:43 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 at 18:46, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> I searched the codes and found some other places where the manipulation
> of lists can be improved in a similar way.
I'd be happy to discuss our thought about List inefficiencies, but I
think to be fair to Miroslav, we should do that somewhere else. The
list_copy_head() discussion was directly related to his patch due to
the list of list_truncate(list_copy(..), ..).  The other things you've
mentioned are not.  Feel free to start a thread and copy me in.

Yeah, that's right.  Thank you for the suggestion.  I started a new
thread here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs49dJnpezDQDDxCPKq7%2B%3D_3NyqLqGqnhqCjd%2BdYe4MS15w%40mail.gmail.com

Thanks
Richard

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jelte Fennema
Date:
Subject: Re: Issue in postgres_fdw causing unnecessary wait for cancel request reply
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add `verify-system` sslmode to use system CA pool for server cert