Re: BUG #17540: Prepared statement: PG switches to a generic query plan which is consistently much slower - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Richard Guo
Subject Re: BUG #17540: Prepared statement: PG switches to a generic query plan which is consistently much slower
Date
Msg-id CAMbWs4-zYenAVp-fmgtvBtWKoauL8gBqUHctP6rOmny5Ox8SkA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #17540: Prepared statement: PG switches to a generic query plan which is consistently much slower  (Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: BUG #17540: Prepared statement: PG switches to a generic query plan which is consistently much slower  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 12:25 PM Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
Setting aside the thread's subject, I am interested in this feature
because of its connection with the SJE feature and the same issue raised
[1] during the discussion.

Thanks for taking an interest in this.

I rebased this patch over the SJE commit, and found that it can help
discard redundant IS_NOT_NULL quals added by SJE logic if we've
successfully removed some self-joins on primary keys, as shown by the
regression test plan changes, which IMO makes this patch look more
useful in practice.
 
Although the patch is already in a good state, some improvements can be
made. Look:
explain (costs off)
SELECT oid,relname FROM pg_class
WHERE oid < 5 OR (oid = 1 AND oid IS NULL);

  Bitmap Heap Scan on pg_class
    Recheck Cond: ((oid < '5'::oid) OR ((oid = '1'::oid) AND (oid IS NULL)))
    ->  BitmapOr
          ->  Bitmap Index Scan on pg_class_oid_index
                Index Cond: (oid < '5'::oid)
          ->  Bitmap Index Scan on pg_class_oid_index
                Index Cond: ((oid = '1'::oid) AND (oid IS NULL))

If we go deeply through the filter, I guess we could replace such buried
clauses.

Yeah, we can do that by exploring harder on OR clauses.  But for now I
think it's more important for this patch to introduce the
'reduce-quals-to-constant' mechanism.  As a start I think it'd be better
to keep the logic simple for review.  In the future maybe we can extend
it to consider more than just NullTest quals, for example we could also
consider applicable constraint expressions of the given relation.

Thanks
Richard
Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18173: ERROR: could not identify a comparison function for type iso-8859-1
Next
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18170: Unexpected error: no relation entry for relid 3