On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 5:40 PM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding the back-patch, this patch is a bug fix, which suggests it
> should be back-patched. However, it also changes some plans by fixing
> the cost estimation. Does anyone know what our usual approach is in
> this situation?
Although this patch could result in plan changes, it fixes an actual
bug, so I've back-patched it to v16.
Thanks
Richard