Re: Retire has_multiple_baserels() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Guo
Subject Re: Retire has_multiple_baserels()
Date
Msg-id CAMbWs4-Y+ynBA1UjxXZR7=dUGjiQtVxFgWWxnWerHz3N2=a44Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Retire has_multiple_baserels()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 1:13 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I thought this test wasn't too complete, because has_multiple_baserels
isn't reached at all in many cases thanks to the way the calling if()
is coded.  I tried testing like this instead:

diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c
index eea49cca7b..3f6fc51fb4 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c
@@ -2649,6 +2649,8 @@ set_subquery_pathlist(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
      */
     remove_unused_subquery_outputs(subquery, rel, run_cond_attrs);

+    Assert(has_multiple_baserels(root) == (bms_membership(root->all_baserels) == BMS_MULTIPLE));
+
     /*
      * We can safely pass the outer tuple_fraction down to the subquery if the
      * outer level has no joining, aggregation, or sorting to do. Otherwise

and came to the same conclusion: check-world finds no cases where
the assertion fails.  So it LGTM too.  Pushed.

Thanks for pushing!

Thanks
Richard

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix typo in psql zh_CN.po
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Lowering the default wal_blocksize to 4K