On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:53 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> Out of the places I saw, it seems we do tend to code things so that we
> don't assume the value has been clamped. E.g.
> adjust_limit_rows_costs() does if (*rows < 1) *rows = 1;
Agreed. In costsize.c I saw a few instances where we have
/* Protect some assumptions below that rowcounts aren't zero */
if (inner_path_rows <= 0)
inner_path_rows = 1;
> I think the best solution is to apply the attached. I didn't test,
> but it should fix the issue you reported and also ensure that
> MemoizePath.calls is never zero, which would also cause issues in the
> hit_ratio calculation in cost_memoize_rescan().
+1.
Thanks
Richard