Re: Virtual generated columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Guo
Subject Re: Virtual generated columns
Date
Msg-id CAMbWs4-JmGEBDucPw8iJ3H8hg-7TkbOqE0WTVzhJ5iyzQyP=-A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Virtual generated columns  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 9:37 PM Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 at 10:59, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> > Maybe a short-term fix would be to error out if we find ourselves about
> > to expand a Var with varnullingrels != NULL.  That would mean you
> > couldn't use a virtual generated column on the nullable output side of
> > an outer join, which is annoying but not fatal, and we could fix it
> > incrementally later.
>
> I think that would be rather a sad limitation to have. It would be
> nice to have this fully working for the next release.

Besides being a limitation, this approach doesn't address all the
issues with incorrect results.  In some cases, PHVs are needed to
isolate subexpressions, even when varnullingrels != NULL.  As an
example, please consider

create table t (a int primary key, b int generated always as (10 + 10));
insert into t values (1);
insert into t values (2);

# select a, b from t group by grouping sets (a, b) having b = 20;
 a | b
---+----
 2 |
 1 |
   | 20
(3 rows)

This result set is incorrect.  The first two rows, where b is NULL,
should not be included in the result set.

> Attached is a rough patch that moves the expansion of virtual
> generated columns to the planner. It needs a lot more testing (and
> some regression tests), but it does seem to fix all the issues
> mentioned in this thread.

Yeah, I believe this is the right way to go: virtual generated columns
should be expanded in the planner, rather than in the rewriter.

It seems to me that, for a relation in the rangetable that has virtual
generated columns, we can consider it a subquery to some extent.  For
instance, suppose we have a query:

select ... from ... join t on ...;

and suppose t.b is a virtual generated column.  We can consider this
query as:

select ... from ... join (select a, expr() as b from t) as t on ...;

In this sense, I'm wondering if we can leverage the
pullup_replace_vars architecture to expand the virtual generated
columns.  I believe this would help avoid a lot of duplicate code with
pullup_replace_vars_callback.

Thanks
Richard



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Restrict copying of invalidated replication slots
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: per backend WAL statistics