On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:23 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
BTW are you by any chance testing on ARM macOS? I reproduced the issue there, but for some reason I did not reproduce the error (and the plan wasn't parallelized) when I tested this on linux. Perhaps I missed setting something up; it seems odd.
Hmm, that's weird. I was also testing that query on linux. But please note that several GUC settings are needed to generate parallel plan for that query.
set min_parallel_table_scan_size to 0; set parallel_setup_cost to 0; set parallel_tuple_cost to 0;
