Re: SPI_connect, SPI_connect_ext return type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stepan Neretin
Subject Re: SPI_connect, SPI_connect_ext return type
Date
Msg-id CAMaYL5Z8iQea4oonLywEEifB1EzegMabpS0_fMjNz4cOA=7qig@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SPI_connect, SPI_connect_ext return type  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SPI_connect, SPI_connect_ext return type
List pgsql-hackers

> So if we tell extension authors they don't need to check the result, it's unlikely
> that that will cause any new code they write to get used with PG
> versions where it would be wrong.
Yes, I concur.

> This combines portions of Stepan's
> two patches with some additional work (mostly, that he'd missed fixing
> any of contrib/).
Thank you for the feedback! I believe the patch looks satisfactory. Should we await a review? The changes seem straightforward to me.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add roman support for to_number function
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SPI_connect, SPI_connect_ext return type