On 22/1/19 10:18 μ.μ., Jeremy Finzel wrote:On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:16 PM Jeremy Finzel <finzelj@gmail.com> wrote:any one of those WAL files will not be archived and recycled as long as it no longer needed by a replication slot:(. s/no longer/still. I meant to say any one of those WAL files will not be archived and recycled as long as it still needed by a replication slot.A WAL segment will be archived as soon as it is completed. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/continuous-archiving.html
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:16 PM Jeremy Finzel <finzelj@gmail.com> wrote:any one of those WAL files will not be archived and recycled as long as it no longer needed by a replication slot:(. s/no longer/still. I meant to say any one of those WAL files will not be archived and recycled as long as it still needed by a replication slot.
any one of those WAL files will not be archived and recycled as long as it no longer needed by a replication slot
A WAL segment will be archived as soon as it is completed. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/continuous-archiving.html
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/continuous-archiving.html
pgsql-general by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных