Jaka Jančar <jaka@kubje.org> writes: > What is a common situation for using Flush instead of Sync? > When would you need and wait for the output, get an error, yet still > proceed to send further messages that you would want the server to ignore?
The only case I can think of offhand is bursting some time-consuming queries to the server, that is sending this all at once:
This presumes that, if an earlier query fails, you want the rest to be abandoned; else you'd use Syncs instead. But if you leave out the Flushes then you won't see the tail end of (or indeed maybe none of) the output of an earlier query until a later query fills the server's output buffer. So if you're hoping to overlap the client's processing with the server's you want the extra flushes.
