Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to clean out pg_init_privs grants - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi Tom,

Is there anything that could be back-patched with reasonable effort ?

--
Hannu

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 6:37 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 17 Jun 2024, at 16:56, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>
> >> I wonder if this will break any tools/scripts in prod which relies on the
> >> previous (faulty) behaviour.  It will be interesting to see if anything shows
> >> up on -bugs.  Off the cuff it seems like a good idea judging by where we are
> >> and what we can fix with it.
> >
> > Considering that SHARED_DEPENDENCY_INITACL has existed for less than
> > two months, it's hard to believe that any outside code has grown any
> > dependencies on it, much less that it couldn't be adjusted readily.
>
> Doh, I was thinking about it backwards, clearly not a worry =)
>
> >> I wonder if it's worth reverting passing the owner ID for v17 and revisiting
> >> that in 18 if we work on recording the ID.  Shaving a few catalog lookups is
> >> generally worthwhile, doing them without needing the result for the next five
> >> years might bite us.
> >
> > Yeah, that was the direction I was leaning in, too.  I'll commit the
> > revert of that separately, so that un-reverting it shouldn't be too
> > painful if we eventually decide to do so.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> --
> Daniel Gustafsson
>