Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Flexible "partition pruning" hook - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mike Palmiotto
Subject Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Flexible "partition pruning" hook
Date
Msg-id CAMN686EqUr9f-OhFxODG7XLQ=ib=XQ=ocjdUQM+2qF1TC4FUnQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Flexible "partition pruning" hook  (Mike Palmiotto <mike.palmiotto@crunchydata.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Flexible "partition pruning" hook  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:59 AM Mike Palmiotto
<mike.palmiotto@crunchydata.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 9:46 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 3:06 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> > I've moved this to the next CF, and marked it as targeting v13.
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Commifest 1 for PostgreSQL 13 is here.  I was just going through the
>> automated build results for the 'fest and noticed that your patch
>> causes a segfault in the regression tests (possibly due to other
>> changes that have been made in master since February).  You can see
>> the complete backtrace on the second link below, but it looks like
>> this is happening every time, so hopefully not hard to track down
>> locally.
>>
>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.46412
>> https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/555380617

Attached you will find a patch (rebased on master) that passes all
tests on my local CentOS 7 box. Thanks again for the catch!

-- 
Mike Palmiotto
Software Engineer
Crunchy Data Solutions
https://crunchydata.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ibrar Ahmed
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - add \aset to store results of a combined query
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql