Re: On login trigger: take three - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikhail Gribkov
Subject Re: On login trigger: take three
Date
Msg-id CAMEv5_s_UpoeQnuURKBsCNmsf0WkqRpRU3tA1i6z2Z_xGrueVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On login trigger: take three  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: On login trigger: take three
List pgsql-hackers
Hi hackers,

The attached v40 patch is a fresh rebase on master branch to actualize the state before the upcoming commitfest.
Nothing has changed beyond rebasing.

And just for convenience, here is a link to the exact message of the thread
describing the current approach:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMEv5_vg4aJOoUC74XJm%2B5B7%2BTF1nT-Yhtg%2BawtBOESXG5Grfg%40mail.gmail.com

--
 best regards,
    Mikhail A. Gribkov

e-mail: youzhick@gmail.com
http://www.strava.com/athletes/5085772
phone: +7(916)604-71-12
Telegram: @youzhick



On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:38 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> On 22 Mar 2023, at 18:54, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Basically, I think 0001 is a good idea -- I'm much more nervous about
> 0002. I think we should get 0001 polished up and committed.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you commented on v27-0001 of the login
event trigger patch series?  Sorry about the confusion if so, this is a very
old and lengthy thread with many twists and turns.  This series was closed
downthread when the original authors of login EVT left, and the 0001 GUC patch
extracted into its own thread.  That patch now lives at:

        https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4013/

This thread was then later revived by Mikhail Gribkov but without 0001 instead
referring to the above patch for that part.

The new patch for 0001 is quite different, and I welcome your eyes on that
since I agree with you that it would be a good idea.

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded