On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> This looks good.
>
> Thanks for looking!
No problem.
In other painfully pedantic news, I should point out that
sizeof(size_t) isn't necessarily word size (the most generic
definition of word size for the architecture), contrary to my reading
of the 0002-* patch comments. I'm mostly talking thinking about x86_64
here, of course.
--
Peter Geoghegan
