On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-12-30 12:29:22 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> But even if that wasn't
>> true, I don't know why you feel the need to go on and on about buffer
>> locking like this months later. Are you trying to be provocative? Can
>> you *please* stop?
>
> ERR? Peter? *You* quoted a statement of mine that only made sense in
> it's original context. And I *did* say that the point about buffer
> locking applied to the *past* version of the patch.
Not so. You suggested it was a bug that needed to be fixed, completely
independently of this effort. You clearly referred to the current
code.
"Yes, it it is different. But, in my opinion, bt_check_unique() doing
so is a bug that needs fixing. Not something that we want to extend."
--
Peter Geoghegan
